Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases

Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 13,589
John Doe et al v. Lockheed Martin et al
as 5:2015cv00994
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, John Doe
Defendant: Does, Lockheed Martin
Smith-Marras v. General Nutrition Corporation
as 1:2015cv00188
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Product Liability
John Doe et al v. Lockheed Martin et al
as 2:2015cv03806
Plaintiff: Jane Doe, John Doe
Defendant: Does, Lockheed Martin
MCGEORGE v. KAZ USA, INC.
as 5:2015cv02271
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Ansagay v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
as 1:2015cv00184
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Anne Beck et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03677
Plaintiff: Anne Beck, Donald Peggs
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Does, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc. and others
Joyce MacDougall et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03605
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Synthes, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff: Donald MacDougall, Joyce MacDougall
"TPS Corp.&quot: Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D. A Professional Corporation
Blum v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015at00570
Plaintiff: Kelly Blum
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Blum v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01033
Plaintiff: Kelly Blum
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Regent et al v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00894
Plaintiff: Kathy Regent, Robert Regent, Jr.
Defendant: Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc., Zimmer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Petition for Removal
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.