Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 18,729
Chelsea Shannon McIntyre v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01984
Petitioner:
Chelsea Shannon McIntyre
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Andres Urena v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02147
Petitioner:
Andres Urena
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Aparicio v. USA
as 1:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
Valdemar Zamora Aparicio
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cook v. USA
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Joseph Drayton Cook
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thayer v. USA
as 2:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Douglas Lee Thayer
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shortey v. USA
as 2:2024cv00435
Petitioner:
Victor Adrian Shortey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United State of America v. Khamnivong
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
United State of America
Defendant:
Phosavan Khamnivong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Daniels v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Akil Saeed Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rojas-Rivera v. USA
as 2:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Victor M Rojas-Rivera
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kramer v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
Fritz Kramer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
