US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 508
Hampton v. Cockrell et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
James Cockrell, Andrew Gault, Richard Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fosi v. Yslas
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gafa Fosi
Defendant:
Yslas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whisler v. Van De Mark et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Zubulon C. Whisler
Defendant:
Joseph Van De Mark, Krista Anderson and Kari Kristiansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. State of Alaska, Courts et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Keen L.A. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Courts, Alaska State Trooper Agency and Timothy Cronin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Elvina Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnelly v. Cagle et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Donnelly
Defendant:
John C. Cagle, Melissa Howard and Elvina Meyer
Tholson v. State of Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Corrections and Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Demetric Quinn Williams
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Rhodes v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Rex L. Butler, Warren Wolfe Esq. and The Staff at Rex L. Butler & Asso.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
