US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Davison v. Mooney
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Edward C. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall et al v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Brian Hall and Richard R. Blevins
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections and Jen Winkelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costigan v. Lawerance
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Samson Slade Costigan
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Lawerance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Wade et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Bradshaw
Defendant:
K. Brannwade, Steele, State of Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Trump
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
Donald John Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young-God v. Lyou et al
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Young-God
Defendant:
Chris Lyou and Michael Guzy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattila v. City of Palmer et al
as 3:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Lonny P. Mattila
Defendant:
City of Palmer, Michael Lynch, Sawyer Skiba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hampton
Defendant:
Arnaldo Hernandez and Nom Thai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. The District Court of Anchorage
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Legacy Carter
Defendant:
The District Court of Anchorage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00199
Plaintiff:
Legacy Carter
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
