US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,371
Costigan v. Lawerance
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Samson Slade Costigan
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Lawerance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. State of Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Leon Tholson
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Corrections and Sparks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Wade et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Bradshaw
Defendant:
K. Brannwade, Steele, State of Alaska Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Einerson et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jackson Bailey
Defendant:
Carol Lynnie Einerson, Michael Zener, Mary LeFavre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. Angol
as 2:2024cv00001
Petitioner:
Ronald K. Barr, Jr.
Respondent:
Sarah Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clayton v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Terry Anthony Clayton
Respondent:
Sara Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A.
as 3:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Cress Carney
Respondent:
State of Alaska D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Torrence v. Hamilton
as 3:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Patrick H. Torrence
Respondent:
Jason Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Burk
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnny-Lee Preston Burk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
