US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 17,777
Kanasia Mishea Walker v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv02930
Plaintiff:
Kanasia Mishea Walker
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hakop Ashchyan v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv02950
Plaintiff:
Hakop Ashchyan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Anabel Munoz v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Anabel Munoz
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Genene Frank
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marlo Hempstead v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02921
Plaintiff:
Marlo Hempstead
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laurelin Hefter v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02922
Plaintiff:
Laurenlin Hefter and Martin O;Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maria Angelica Jimenez-Estrada v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02923
Plaintiff:
Maria Angelica Jimenez-Estrada
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Christine Marie Small v. Martin OMalley
as 8:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Christine Marie Small
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Audrey Peters v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02895
Plaintiff:
Audrey Peters
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ana Lisette Tillman v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Ana Lisette Tillman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
