US District Court for the Northern District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,376
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 4:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Erik Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sirot v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Pierre Marcel Sirot
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alexander v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02276
Plaintiff:
Kristine Alexander
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02219
Plaintiff:
Brandy J. Jordan
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Perez v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Fidel Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Maria Ner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Valverde v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Valverde
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Saltalamachia et al v. MARTIN 0'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01725
Defendant:
James Saltalamachia and Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pacheco v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Jack Edward Pacheco
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ward v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv01692
Plaintiff:
Teresa Ward
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
