US District Court for the Southern District of California Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 189
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01449
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc.
Defendant: K.O.O. Construction, Inc., Great American Insurance Company and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Rexel USA, Inc. v. Souza Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00964
Defendant: Arthur F. Gallagher & Co. Insurance Brokers of California Inc., Brac Electric, Inc., Does 1 through 30 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Rexel USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Steven Field Plumbing v. Anderson Burton Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02346
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Steven Field Plumbing
Defendant: Western Surety Company and Anderson Burton Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Sygnos, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01614
Defendant: Sygnos, Inc. and Western Surety Company
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States For The Use and Benefit Of Infinity Metals, Inc. v. Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01497
Defendant: Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc., Does 1 Through 10, K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: United States For The Use and Benefit Of Infinity Metals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States For the Use of Gotham Poured Rubber v. MW Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01416
Plaintiff: United States For the Use of Gotham Poured Rubber
Defendant: MW Services Inc., DOES 1 to 10 and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Facilities Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01414
Plaintiff: United States of America for The Use and Benefit of Facilities Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., Does 1 Through 10, Heffler Contracting Group and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Type: Contract Miller Act
BCP Mechanical, LLC v. Anderson Burton Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01311
Defendant: Western Surety Company and Anderson Burton Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: BCP Mechanical, LLC and United States of America for the use of and Benefit of BCP Mechanical, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States, for the Use of B&B Roadway and Security Solutions LLC v. Servitek Solutions, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01253
Defendant: Servitek Solutions, Inc., Argonaut Insurance Company and DOES 1 to 10
Plaintiff: B&B Roadway and Security Solutions LLC and United States, For The Use of B&B Roadway and Security Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01243
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Coastline Steel and Construction, Inc.
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10, K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?