US District Court for the Southern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,072
Williams v. Fisher
as 3:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Williams
Respondent:
Raythel Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apodaca v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
James Lewis Apodaca
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avila v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00616
Petitioner:
Perry Robert Avila
Respondent:
Fidencio Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grigoryan v. Macomber
as 3:2024cv00619
Petitioner:
Aznaur Grigoryan
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Allen
as 3:2024cv00560
Petitioner:
Derek A. Hill
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seau v. Pfeiffer et al
as 3:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Roland I Seau
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Montanez et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Savannah R. Montanez and Appellate Defenders Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter v. Guzman
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguon v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
