Guam Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United States for the Use and Benefit of Relyant Global, LLC v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF RELYANT GLOBAL, LLC and Relyant Global, LLC
Defendant: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Zurich American Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Blastco Incorporated et al v. APTIM Federal Services, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Plaintiff: Blastco Incorporated
Defendant: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and APTIM Federal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Contrack Watts, Inc. v. Relyant Global, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant: Sompo International Insurance and Relyant Global, LLC
Plaintiff: United States for the Use and Benefit of Contrack Watts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the Use and Benefit of Tereas, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00043
Defendant: Zurich American Insurance Company and Pernix Guam, LLC
Plaintiff: United States for the Use and Benefit of Tereas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
JWS Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use of JWS Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Ltd. and JWS Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Ltd.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and P and S Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use of JWS Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Ltd. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use of JWS Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Ltd.
Defendant: Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and P and S Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc., a California Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00024
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use of the Camacho Family Partnership dba "Dirt Doktor" v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America et al
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Patricia I. Romero, Inc.
Counter_claimant: Patricia I. Romero, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Counter_defendant: United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use of Western Partitions, Inc., An Oregon corporation v. Watts Webcor Obayashi A JV et al
as 1:2014cv00025
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use of Western Partitions, Inc.
Defendant: Watts Webcor Obayashi A JV, Federal Insurance Company, Safeco Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 1:2014cv00021
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of the Camacho Family Partnership
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?