Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,612
Friedli v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: Ronald Joshua Friedli
Defendant: Richardson, Eliason, Patchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Close v. Ivy Medical et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Brynn Marie Close
Defendant: Ivy Medical, TFCJ, Doug Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Hummer, et al.
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: Devin M Lawson
Defendant: Deputy Hummer, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office and Sgt. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogstad v. Richardson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00588
Petitioner: Jesse Rogstad
Respondent: Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff: Kent Williams
Defendant: Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyer v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff: Tamara Lee Moyer
Defendant: State of Idaho and Ada County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff: Sharon Mary
Defendant: Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogstad v. Richardson et al
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff: Jesse Rogstad
Defendant: Warden Richardson and IDOC Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?