US District Court for the District of Montana
Cases 31 - 40 of 13,151
Grigg v. City of Libby
as 9:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Defendant:
City of Libby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Backcountry Horsemen of Missoula et al v. Marten et al
as 9:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Backcountry Horsemen of Missoula, Friends of Bitterroot and Selway-Pintler Wilderness Backcountry Horsemen
Defendant:
Leanne Marten, Randy Moore and Lisa Timchak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
O'Yates v. Pluid et al
as 9:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jesicca O'Yates
Defendant:
Laura Pluid, Regan Lewis, Fortine School and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calumet Montana Refining, LLC v. Regan
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Calumet Montana Refining, LLC
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Kraske v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Aleisha Kraske
Defendant:
State of Montana, Brent Lashinski, Marti Vining and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
406 Bovine, Inc. v. Dumm et al
as 9:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
406 Bovine, Inc.
Defendant:
Richard Dumm, John Bierwirth and DATAG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
United States of America v. Lang et al
as 9:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tayln Lang, Heirloom Remedies and Heirloom Curiosities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Pruett v. USA
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Cynthia Rae Pruett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Olson v. USA
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Matthew Stoney Olson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
