US District Court for the District of Nevada Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 13,928
Crusan v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michael Crusan, Sr
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Sr., Medical Director, Aurom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Salmonson
as 3:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Joel S. Elliott
Respondent:
Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Battles v. Pollard
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Battles
Defendant:
Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsatsa v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Theodore Tsatsa
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Halkie, Vallegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Leo Lionel Alvarez
Respondent:
Steve B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Repp et al
as 2:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Ambibe Collins
Defendant:
J. Repp and Jaymie Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Cardella et al
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Raymond Paul Rosas
Defendant:
Cardella, Henley, Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brooks v. District Attorney Joshua Judd
as 2:2024cv00679
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
District Attorney Joshua Judd and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
