Nevada Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 13,932
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Dakota Romero
as 3:2024cv00151
Not Yet Classified:
Dakota Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
Gerald Jerome Polk
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinn v. Nasera et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Trellis Quinn
Defendant:
Gabriela Nasera, Locher, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paduani v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Neftali Paduani
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Dean Ontiveras and Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jeff Glover
Defendant:
C/O Brown, C/O Swedias, Warden Hutching and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Rigney
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Money Coleman
Defendant:
Rigney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brumfield v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00652
Petitioner:
Keith Deon Brumfield
Respondent:
Brian Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elkaz v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00650
Petitioner:
Sinisa Elkaz
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Kerri Quihuis, Field Office Director for Detention and Removal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
