U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,061
Pemberton v. Miller
as 24-7027
Petitioner: PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Respondent: MICHAEL MILLER, Warden
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff: GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant: KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Miller v. Medina, et al
as 24-1129
Plaintiff: JACK L. MILLER, III
Defendant: SERGEANT MEDINA and SERGEANT LILES
United States v. Mirabal
as 24-2048
Petitioner: GABRIEL MIRABAL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sherfield v. Diaz, et al
as 24-6061
Plaintiff: ANTONIO D. SHERFIELD
Defendant: FNU DIAZ, FNU LEATH and MIKE LOGAN
Bond, et al v. Sheriff of Ottawa County
as 24-5035
Plaintiff: AUSTIN P. BOND, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terral Ellis, II, deceased, TERRAL B. ELLIS, SR. and SHELLY BLISS
Defendant: SHERIFF OF OTTAWA COUNTY, in his official capacity, OFFICER JOHNNY BRAY and OFFICER CHARLES SHOEMAKER
Woodley v. United States
as 24-1121
Plaintiff: ANTONIO WOODLEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Aurelio v. Mullin, et al
as 24-1120
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS JOSEPH AURELIO
Defendant: LARA J. MULLIN, MARION ALISON ROCKER-TUOHY, JAY SUTHERLAND GRANT and others
United States v. Jones
as 24-5034
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAROWE JUNIOR JONES
Young v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc.
as 24-5033
Plaintiff: DEBORAH YOUNG, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Gwendolyn Young, deceased, ALMA MCCAFFREY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gregory Brown, deceased, CHRISTINE WRIGHT, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Lisa Salgado, deceased and others
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, INC., STANLEY GLANZ, Sheriff of Tulsa County, in His Individual capacity, CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT OF OKLAHOMA, INC. and others
Appellant: DANIEL E. SMOLEN and ROBERT M. BLAKEMORE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?