U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Labor Cases

Other Labor Litigation Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff: DANIEL COCHRAN
Defendant: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. and others
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1032
Petitioner: MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner: MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Ingram v. United Biosource Corporation
as 23-3270
Plaintiff: K. K. INGRAM
Defendant: UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION
Stewart v. United Parcel Service
as 23-3149
Plaintiff / Appellant: KEVIN R. STEWART
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Spagnolia v. Charter Communications
as 23-1190
Plaintiff / Appellant: HEATHER SPAGNOLIA
Defendant / Appellee: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Hamilton v. Amazon.com Services
as 23-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL HAMILTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Menocal, et al v. GEO Group
as 22-1409
Plaintiff / Appellee: ALEJANDRO MENOCAL, MARCOS BRAMBILA, LOURDES ARGUETA and others
Defendant / Appellant: THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Holt v. Foot Locker Retail
as 22-3240
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL HOLT
Defendant / Appellee: FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Richan v. Ageiss
as 22-1278
Plaintiff / Appellee: TED S. RICHAN
Defendant / Appellant: AGEISS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?