U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,129
Melvin Walker v. Senior Law Center, et al
as 24-1075
Plaintiff:
MELVIN FRANK WALKER
Defendant:
SENIOR LAW CENTER, CITIZENS BANK OF PHILADELPHIA and KAREN C. BUCK
James Mosley v. Wells Fargo, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO and SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
In re: Domus BWW Funding LLC
as 24-1036
Debtor:
In re: DOMUS BWW FUNDING LLC and 1801 ADMIN LLC
Defendant:
ARCH INSURANCE CO, QBE INSURANCE CORP, XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CORP and others
In re: Lincoln National COI Litigation
as 24-1033
Plaintiff:
US LIFE 1 RENDITEFONDS GMBH, US LIFE 2 RENDITEFONDS GMBH, ROBERT ROMBRO and others
Defendant:
ALLEN I. MINDLIN, LAURA WEINSTEIN, RICHARD WEINSTEIN and others
Appellant:
SECURITIES INTERMEDIARY MOVANTS AND BENEFICIAL OWNER MOVANTS
In re: Lincoln National 2017 COI Rate Litigation
as 24-1034
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. TRINCHERO, MARSHALL LEWIS TUTOR, NANCY S. KESSELHAUT and others
Defendant:
LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP and LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
Appellant:
SECURITIES INTERMEDIARY MOVANTS AND BENEFICIAL OWNER MOVANTS
Azer Scientific LLC v. Quidel Corp
as 24-1022
Plaintiff:
AZER SCIENTIFIC INC and AZER SCIENTIFIC LLC
Defendant:
QUIDEL CORP
Zenith Insurance Company v. Martin Newell, Jr., et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff:
ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MARTIN P. NEWELL, JR. and MPN INC
Hussain Kareem v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 24-1018
Plaintiff:
HUSSAIN KAREEM
Defendant:
PHH MORTGAGE CORP, doing business as PHH Mortgage Services and NEWREZ LLC
Component Enterprises Co Inc, Fairhill Cable Produ v. Selective Way Insurance Co
as 24-1014
Plaintiff:
COMPONENT ENTERPRISES CO INC, FAIRHILL CABLE PRODUCTS INC TIA VICTOR INDUSTRIES, PENN & ARCH LLC AND/OR THEODORE & JOHN HOFFMAN, THEODORE HOFFMAN, HOFFMANOPOLY, AND COMPONENT ENTERPRISES CO INC 401K PLAN
Defendant:
SELECTIVE WAY INSURANCE CO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
