U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,691
Telly Royster v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1698
Plaintiff: TELLY ROYSTER
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Leeon Frasier v. Warden Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff: LEEON ANTONIO FRASIER
Defendant: WARDEN COAL TOWNSHIP SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Francis Boyd v. Superintendent Chester SCI, et al
as 24-1692
Petitioner: FRANCIS BOYD
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff: JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Malik Bey v. Superintendent Somerset SCI, et al
as 24-1667
Plaintiff: MALIK ABDUL BEY
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Clyde Jones v. Warden Canaan USP
as 24-1651
Plaintiff: CLYDE JONES
Defendant: WARDEN CANAAN USP
USA v. Alexander Ros Lazo
as 24-1662
Petitioner: ALEXANDER ROS LAZO
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John McDonald v. District Attorney Dauphin County, et al
as 24-1650
Plaintiff: JOHN MAURICE MCDONALD
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY DAUPHIN COUNTY, WARDEN FRACKVILLE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Gustavo Velez-Hernandez v. District Attorney Lehigh County, et al
as 24-1642
Plaintiff: GUSTAVO D. VELEZ-HERNANDEZ
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT WAYMART SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
William Neal v. Superintendent Coal Township SCI, et al
as 24-1628
Plaintiff: WILLIAM NEAL
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT COAL TOWNSHIP SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?