U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,865
Nathaniel Magwood v. Jennifer Haberstadt
as 15-1552
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL MAGWOOD
Defendant - Appellee: JENNIFER HABERSTADT, City of Charleston Police Dept., THOMAS CONSTANZA, Charleston County Sheriff Dept.
David Clenney v. V. Swartz
as 15-1535
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID T. CLENNEY
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER V. R. SWARTZ
GTC Services, LLC v. Region Q Workforce Investment
as 15-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant: GTC SERVICES, LLC
Defendant - Appellee: REGION Q WORKFORCE INVESTMENT CONSORTIUM, MID-EAST COMMISSION
Linda Evans v. Pitt County Dept Soc Svcs
as 15-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA A. EVANS
Defendant - Appellee: GEORGE L. PERRY, Director of Pitt County Social Services in his official capacity, CYNTHIA M. ROSS, in her individual capacity, PITT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Sin City v. State of North Carolina
as 15-6742
Plaintiff - Appellant: SIN YORK CITY, a/k/a Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Lee Sewell v. James Rogers
as 15-1527
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEE ROY SEWELL
Defendant - Appellee: MAGISTRATE JAMES F. ROGERS, DILLON COUNTY
Lauren Graham v. C. Gagnon
as 15-1521
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAUREN GRAHAM
Defendant - Appellee: C. GAGNON, JANNIE CLIPP
Robert Carrol Davidson v. Jesse Francis Amos
as 15-1512
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT CARROL DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee: JESSE FRANCIS AMOS, LAQUITA R. AMOS, CLYDE H. PERDUE
Marilyn Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Virginia
as 15-1514
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARILYN ALTIZER
Defendant - Appellee: TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF VIRGINIA, JAMES K. MCGLOTHLIN, individually and in his official capacity as Town Manager
Tod Jack v. Virginia Bureau of Insurance
as 15-1508
Plaintiff - Appellant: TOD JACK
Defendant - Appellee: VIRGINIA BUREAU OF INSURANCE
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.