U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 5,357
Anthony Hoover El v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6228
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JUDGE L. TODD BURKE
Montavius Johnson v. David Mitchell
as 24-6230
Plaintiff:
MONTAVIUS ANTOINE JOHNSON-EL
Defendant:
DAVID MITCHELL, Facility Head Administrator Individual and Official Capacity, DAVID AARON, Captain of Security Operations Individual and Official Capacity, MCPHERSON, Correctional Staff Officer Individual and Official Capacity and others
Dajade Melby v. Lt. Rigsby
as 24-6222
Plaintiff:
DAJADE MELBY
Defendant:
LT. RIGSBY and LT. JEAN-PIERRE
Vincent Wilson v. Richard Ashby
as 24-6221
Plaintiff:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD B. ASHBY, DR. ASIA SWAIN and DR. YASAS RODRIGO
Todd Dean v. Mrs. Brown
as 24-6202
Plaintiff:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, Warden, MRS. BLUNT, Counselor, MR. PAYNE, Case Manager and others
Donald Parker v. Nurse C. Boyd
as 24-6201
Plaintiff:
DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
NURSE C. BOYD, NURSE R. MENESES and HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL
Kenneth Rivera v. Dennis Patterson
as 24-6208
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth D. Rivera, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera, a/k/a Syncere Shabazz
Defendant:
DENNIS PATTERSON, D.H.O., STACEY RICHARDSON, Inmate Classification, MR. FREDDRIKS, Associate Warden and others
Leon Johnson v. F. Duty
as 24-6197
Plaintiff:
LEON JERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
F. DUTY, sued in individual capacity, J. R. MASSINGILL, sued in individual capacity, J. R. ADAMS and others
Londell Alston v. Sanders
as 24-6189
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD DEPUTY SANDERS, COUNTY OF YORK DEU JOHN DOE #1 and COUNTY OF YORK DEU JOHN DOE #2
Londell Alston v. John Hicks
as 24-6190
Plaintiff:
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant:
JOHN HICKS, Chief, RODNEY HOPE, Sergeant, Chief and COUNTY OF YORK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
