U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Andrew Berzanskis, et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 24-1137
Not Yet Classified:
In re: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BERZANSKIS, 22-cv-10508, MARGARET WILENSKY, 22-cv-10508, VERONICA BRYAN, 22-cv-10771 and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES, FCA US, LLC
Jodi Tapply, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 23-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI TAPPLY, on behalf of themselves and all others similiarly situated, JEANNETTE BUSCHMAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similiarly situated, MICHAEL PARTIPILO, on behalf of themselves and all others similiarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., et al
as 22-5469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., successor to Continental Teves, Inc., CONTITECH NORTH AMERICA, INC. and CONTINENTAL TIRE THE AMERICAS, LLC
Wade Johnson, et al v. HDAV Corporation, et al
as 14-5057
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WADE JOHNSON and MAL, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
HDAV CORPORATION, PETER FISCHER, Individually and CRAIG SCHREIBER, Individually
Thompson I.G., LLC v. Edgetech I.G., Inc.
as 13-2652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMPSON I.G., LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
EDGETECH I.G., INC.
Fish Farms Partnership v. Winston-Weaver Co. Inc.
as 12-6593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FISH FARMS PARTNERSHIP
Defendant - Appellee:
WINSTON-WEAVER CO. INC.
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al
as 11-3713
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYCO MANUFACTURING, INC.
Plaintiff:
FECON, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
DEUTZ CORPORATION and DEUTZ AG
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc., et al v. Deutz Corporation, et al
as 11-3639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYCO MANUFACTURING, INC.
Plaintiff:
FECON, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DEUTZ CORPORATION and DEUTZ AG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.