U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,392
Timothy Davis v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
as 24-5103
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EUGENE ELVIS DAVIS
Defendant:
SIG SAUER, INC.
Christopher Armstrong v. Andrew Shirvell
as 23-2092
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
ANDREW L. SHIRVELL
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 23-6096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Charisma Hudson, et al v. Datanyze, LLC
as 23-3998
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARISMA HUDSON, Ohio citizens, individually and as the representatives of a class of similarly situated persons and BRIAN SCHAEFER, Ohio citizens, individually and as the representatives of a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant / Appellee:
DATANYZE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Emma Coleman v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, et al
as 23-6044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMA COLEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, dba Wal-Mart No. 2548, STANLEY ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and C & C DOORS, LLC
Equine Podiatry Solutions, LLC v. Blood-Horse, LLC
as 23-6032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EQUINE PODIATRY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOOD-HORSE, LLC
John Curran, III v. Carl Fronabarger, et al
as 23-6015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Defendant / Appellee:
CARL A. FRONABARGER, STATE OF TENNESSEE, J. BRENT BRADBURY and others
David Brantley v. USA, et al
as 23-5976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID THOMAS HARRIS BRANTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GOVERNMENT OF CANADA
Terrance McClain, et al v. Shiama Ray, et al
as 23-3892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE MCCLAIN and ASHLEY HARDWICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIAMA LYNN RAY, originally named as Lynn Shiama, SHAUN TAYLOR and OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAID
Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Incorporated
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA D. SUTHERLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
