U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Marcel Sieler v. Atieva, Inc., et al
as 23-15068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCEL SIELER
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC MAGNUS BACH, HANS-CHRISTOPH ECKSTEIN, WIEBKE ECKSTEIN and others
Yondr, Inc. v. Win Elements, LLC, et al
as 22-56104
Appellant:
FREDERIC M. DOUGLAS
Plaintiff:
YONDR, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Counter Claimant:
WIN ELEMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company and JOHN NGUYEN, an individual
ELT Sight, Inc., et al v. EyeLight, Inc., et al
as 22-56076
Plaintiff:
ELT SIGHT, INC. and ELLIOT FRIEDMAN
Defendant:
EYELIGHT, INC. and MICHAEL S. BERLIN
3Rd Party Defendant:
MLASE A.G., JOHANES JUNGER, MARCUS ENDERS and others
IQE plc v. Newport Fab, LLC, et al
as 22-55924
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IQE PLC
Defendant / Appellant:
NEWPORT FAB, LLC, DBA Jazz Semiconductor, TOWER U.S. HOLDINGS INC., TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR LTD. and others
TriPharma, LLC v. First Fruits Business Ministry, LLC, et al
as 22-55893
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TRIPHARMA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
FIRST FRUITS BUSINESS MINISTRY, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company, FIRST FRUITS BEVERAGE COMPANY, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company, ROGER J. CATARINO, an individual and others
Alaska Railroad Corporation v. Flying Crown Subdivision Addition No. 1 & No. 2, et al
as 22-35573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALASKA RAILROAD CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant:
FLYING CROWN SUBDIVISION ADDITION NO. 1 AND ADDITION NO. 2 PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, a non-profit
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, DEPT OF LAW
George Betak v. Steven Kuhn, et al
as 20-16418
Claimant:
STEVEN H. KUHN and STEVEN HOWARD KUHN
Defendant / Appellee:
ELECTRIC MOTOR WERKS, INC., a Delaware corporation, ENEL X NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware corporation and VALERY MIFTAKHOV
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE BETAK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
