U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 422
Eric Malone v. Palm Springs Police Department
as 23-55446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC RAY MALONE
Defendant / Appellee:
PALM SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Raymond De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al
as 23-35337
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND DE BOTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE and others
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, et al v. Douglas Moylan, et al
as 23-15602
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GUAM SOCIETY OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, GUAM NURSES ASSOCIATION, MILTON H. COLE, Jr., Reverend and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. MOYLAN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Guam
Defendant / Appellee:
LOURDES LEON GUERRERO, in her official capacity as Governor of Guam, ARTHUR U. SAN AGUSTIN, MHR, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Public Health and Social Services, LILLIAN PEREZ-POSADAS, M.N., R.N., in her official capacity as Administrator of the Guam Memorial Hospital and others
Cisco Systems, Inc., et al v. Wilson Chung, et al
as 23-15590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation and CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
WILSON CHUNG and PLANTRONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
JAMES HE, JEDD WILLIAMS and THOMAS PUORRO
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, R. J. REYNOLDS VAPOR COMPANY, AMERICAN SNUFF COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and SUMMER STEPHAN, in her official capacity as District Attorney for the County of San Diego
Lance Boland, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANCE BOLAND, an individual, MARIO SANTELLAN, an individual, RENO MAY, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant:
DOES, 1-10
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND and others
Alison Cole-Kelly v. Betty Yee, et al
as 23-15413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALISON COLE-KELLY, Individually and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as California State Controller and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Daniel Crowe, et al v. Oregon State Bar, et al
as 23-35193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL Z. CROWE and OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE K. PETERSON I
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation, OREGON STATE BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS, VANESSA A. NORDYKE, President of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors and others
USA v. State of Idaho
as 23-35153
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIKE MOYLE, Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, CHUCK WINDER, President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate and THE SIXTY-SEVENTH IDAHO LEGISLATURE, Proposed Intevenor-Defendants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
