U.S. Court of International Trade
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,393
Brooklyn Bedding, LLC et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Bedding, LLC, FXI, Inc., Kolcraft Enterprises Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States
Froggy's Fog, LLC. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Froggy's Fog, LLC.
Defendant:
United States
Zinus, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Zinus, Inc.
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
CVB Inc. doing business as Malouf
Auxin Solar Inc. et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Auxin Solar Inc. and Concept Clean Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Commerce, Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor:
American Clean Power Association, Canadian Solar (USA) Inc., Canadian Solar International Limited and others
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc. and Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
United States
U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Kingtom Aluminio S.R.L.
Hanon Systems Alabama Corp. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Hanon Systems Alabama Corp.
Defendant:
United States
Amsted Rail Company, Inc. et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Amsted Rail Company, Inc. and ASF-K de Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V.
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
Coalition of Freight Coupler Producers
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Teknik Aluminyum Sanayi A.S.
Defendant:
United States
Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. et al v. United States
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. and Carbon Activated Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
