US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Cases 21 - 30 of 43,282
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mankins v. Spring
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mankins
Defendant:
Spring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Commr of Correction
as 3:2024cv00753
Petitioner:
Alexander Rosa
Respondent:
Commr of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Faison v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Howard Faison
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Rodriguez
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Xavier Arsenio Rivera
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petaway v. Ansonia Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
William Petaway
Defendant:
Ansonia Police Department, City of Ansonia, Blue Brook Properties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Newkirk v. Doyle et al
as 3:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Gordon L. Newkirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul R. Doyle, Donavan Murphy and Hilary Carpender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castiglione v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Kim Castiglione
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ruiz et al v. Homesite Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Lilia S. Ruiz and Ana I. Ruiz
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
