US District Court for the District of Guam

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,138
Kileleman v. Unpingco et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Elaine Kileleman
Defendant: Robert Unpingco and Robinett Unpingco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Esperon v. Bordallo
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: James J. Esperon
Defendant: Fred Bordallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
E.M.B. Electrical Inc. v. Granite-Obayashi, a Joint Venture
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: E.M.B. Electrical Inc.
Defendant: Granite-Obayashi, a Joint Venture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Matulich v. Gateway Network Connections, LLC.
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: Russell A. Matulich
Defendant: Gateway Network Connections, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Chargualaf v. Guam Daily Post et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00024
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Guam Waterworks Authority et al
as 1:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Guam Waterworks Authority and Government of Guam
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
CASE OPENED IN ERROR v. CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: CASE OPENED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
CASE OPENED IN ERROR v. CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff: CASE OPENED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
CASE OPENED IN ERROR v. CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff: CASE OPENED IN ERROR
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Leipheimer et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Mrs. Sandra L Leipheimer, John W Leipheimer, Sandra L. Leipheimer and others
Defendant: United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?