US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 11 - 20 of 126,490
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brown v. Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
as 2:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Robert I. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Fayette County, West Virginia Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hanley v. Adkins
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert Hanley
Defendant:
Otha Ray Adkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner:
Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reed v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Corey Stephon Reed
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VanNote v. Jackson County Magistrate Court et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Timothy VanNote
Defendant:
Jackson County Magistrate Court and Jackson County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
