Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 21 - 30 of 268,189
Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv61082
Plaintiff: Andrew Mitchell
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Sepanek
as 7:2015cv00043
Petitioner: Jarrod Marquel Johnson
Respondent: Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Insurance Contract
McBee v. Warden USP Allenwood
as 2:2015cv00061
Petitioner: Christopher Lee McBee
Respondent: Warden USP Allenwood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SCOTT v. CRICKMAR
as 1:2015cv00084
Petitioner: EARL RANDOLPH SCOTT
Respondent: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. BARROW
as 5:2015cv00186
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANTONIO WILLIAMS
Respondent: DONALD BARROW
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00146
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00147
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Petitioner: ROBERT LAMAR JACKSON
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Qualtrough v. Seabolt et al
as 2:2015cv00110
Petitioner: Tracy Qualtrough
Respondent: Kathy Seabolt, Kathleen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brichetto v. Sepanek
as 7:2015cv00042
Petitioner: Thomas P. Brichetto, Jr.
Respondent: M. Sepanek
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Glover El v. Sepank
as 7:2015cv00041
Petitioner: Lonnell Glover El
Respondent: Michael Sepank
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.