Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 415,721
Dante Danil Carter v. F. Guzman
as 5:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dante Danil Carter
Respondent:
F Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown, Jr. v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50104
Petitioner:
Rickey Dale Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carson v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00793
Petitioner:
Charles Carson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McPherson v. Hill et al
as 6:2024cv06164
Petitioner:
Oswald McPherson
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill and DOCCS Commissioner Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neff v. Mason et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Petitioner:
Keith Neff
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Karen Noone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pimpton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Frederick Devell Pimpton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gutierrez Reed et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Hanna Gutierrez Reed, Alec Baldwin and Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, FNU LNU and Michelle L. Grisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC)Ramirez v. Scholyer
as 1:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Peter Torres Ramirez
Respondent:
Charles Scholyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.