Prisoner Petitions Cases

Prison Condition Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 102,623
SUGGS v. WHITE et al
as 4:2015cv00264
Plaintiff: CALVIN E SUGGS, JR
Defendant: HOPE ELLEN WHITE, KAREN ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Thomas v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2015cv00181
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Demarco Taylor v. Helen Hamilton, et al
as 15-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEMARCO L. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee: HELEN HAMILTON, ANGELICA JOYNER, Correctional Officer, GRIEVANCE OFFICER HASTINGS and others
Foster v. Autauga County Metro Jail, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00334
Plaintiff: Willie E. Foster, Jr.
Defendant: Autauga County Metro Jail, Larry Nixon, Herbie Johnson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Williams v. Commonwealth of PA Dept of Cor, et al
as 15-2254
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTHONY E. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MERCER SCI, CAMP HILL SCI and others
Joseph Dauzat v. Bessie Carter, et al
as 15-30458
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOSEPH DAUZAT
Defendant - Appellant: BESSIE CARTER, RN - CCN/M - Director of Nursing, LAURA BUCKLEY, LPN, CASEY MCVEA, Doctor
Robert Sango v. Michigan State Office of Admi, et al
as 15-1590
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT D. SANGO
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS AND RULES, SUSAN MORRIS, Administrative Hearing Officer
Nathaniel Ward v. Campbell, et al
as 15-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL WARD
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN CAMPBELL, C/O, DAVID THEUT, 048, Hearing Officer
Theopolis Williams v. Rick Harrington, et al
as 15-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant: THEOPOLIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: RICK HARRINGTON, GAIL WALLS, RN, Director of Nurses, Menard Correctional Center, KIMBERLY BUTLER, Warden of Programs, Menard Correctional Center and others
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.