US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,738
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harshaw v. Clemson et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Darnell DeMarcus DeDrea Harshaw
Defendant:
C/O Clemson, C/O Charlie and C/O Jacob
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brocato v. Hamm
as 7:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Defendant:
Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08012
Petitioner:
DeAnte Marquise Ford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Angela Johnson
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paw v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
April Paw
Respondent:
Warden K Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
