US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,416
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Centauri Specialty Insurance Company et al v. Hill Robinson Insurance Agency, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Centauri Specialty Insurance Company and Centauri Specialty Managers, Inc.
Defendant:
Hill Robinson Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. Houchens Food Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Not Yet Classified:
Houchens Food Group, Inc., Food Giant Supermarkets, Inc. and william e white
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Pathway of Baldwin County, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00355
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Vernon Guy
Respondent:
Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Winston L. Harrison
Respondent:
Kenneth Peters and Lanetta Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chanel, Inc. v. Pettway
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Danyell Bennett Pettway d/b/a 1 of a kind Diva boutique
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
