Alabama Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,507
Roberts v. Segal
as 5:2024cv00309
Plaintiff: Nicholos Kirk Roberts
Defendant: Andrew John Segal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
May v. TransUnion Credit Bureau et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Jamie Christopher May
Defendant: TransUnion Credit Bureau and William Bill Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkes v. Johnson et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff: Randall Wilkes
Defendant: Steve Johnson, Dana Howell and Rick Chancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huey v. McCall et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff: William Bart Huey
Defendant: Captain McCall and Officer McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyde v. Wise (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: Tristan Michael Hyde
Defendant: Kevin Wise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: McArthur Lynch, Jr
Defendant: Hon. Steve Marshall, John Q. Hamm, Warden Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Shianna et al
as 4:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Markus OShea Payne
Defendant: Shianna, Brittany, Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff: David P. Wilson
Defendant: John Q. Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff: Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant: Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villafana v. Marshall et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Peter J. Villafana
Defendant: Steven T. Marshall, Nicki M. McFerrin, Justin Louvorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?