District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 71 - 80 of 90,016
Rancher v. ALFA Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Gladys Rancher
Defendant:
ALFA Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Craig v. Tyer et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markel Craig, Jr
Defendant:
Cindy Tyer and Peter Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Butler v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08010
Petitioner:
Brandon Maurice Butler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Letterlough v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Nyree Letterlough
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Russell v. Midfield, City of
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Russell
Defendant:
Midfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Green v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Nena Green
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Channel Partners Capital, LLC v. Property Holders Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Channel Partners Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Property Holders Investments, LLC and Sean Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. v. Hamilton
as 2:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Simplot AB Retail, Inc. doing business as Simplot Grower Solutions
Defendant:
Oscar L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al v. Pirtle
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson and J. R.
Defendant:
Lisa Pirtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
