Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Browse by Judge

 



Other Statutes - Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Alaska District Court [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 4 of 4
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
November 27, 2007
Becker v Hudson, et al AK Beistline Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff: Jan F Becker; Defendant: Warden Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A Faital, G. W. Bush, United Way of Alaska
 
May 22, 2007
Hubbard et al v. Brown et al AK Beistline Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations No cause code entered
Plaintiff: Brian Hubbard, Irma Cooper, Jennifer Hubbard, Bob Hubbard, Robert Charles Hug; Defendant: Jay Brown, Coy Carter, Thomas A Carter, Jimmy Don Carter, Richard A Carter and others...
 
May 21, 2007
Hallam v. Perkins Coie, LLP et al AK Sedwick Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff: Stuart Hallam; Defendant: Perkins Coie, LLP, Preston Gates Ellis, LLP, James Leik, Helena Hall, Douglas S. Parker
 
February 28, 2007
Helen M. Smith v. John W. Sedwick, et al AK Sedwick Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff: Helen M. Smith; Defendant: John W. Sedwick, Ralph R. Beistline, Timothy M. Burgess, James K. Singleton, H. Russel Holland and others...
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.