US District Court for the District of Alaska Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Polt v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Gaillard v. Reading
as 3:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyrone Gaillard
Defendant:
Tim Reading
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Z. v. Alaska-Arizona Renters et al
as 4:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Hildebrandt Goldie Z.
Defendant:
Alaska-Arizona Renters, Nation Wide Wells Fargo Banks Since 1864, Eunice Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polt v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2014cv00226
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Polt
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Elias Robinson and Michaela Robinson
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corp., Roy Range and Cristine Prosak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kennedy v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Esther Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gesulga et al v. Municipality of Anchorage
as 3:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Brian Gesulga , John Kuchnicki and John Franklin
Defendant:
Municipality of Anchorage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Deans v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00230
Plaintiff:
Lewis Deans
Defendant:
Steven L. Jones , Lythgoe Properties , Alaska Properties & Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
as 3:2010cv00049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Latham v. Weidner Investment Services, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robert Latham
Defendant:
Weidner Investment Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
