Arizona Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,372
Warfield v. Nance
as 2:2023cv00504
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Mealey et al
as 2:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Foreva Wings Bar & Grill Incorporated an unknown business entity doing business as Foreva Wings formerly known as Foreva Wings Bar & Grill LLC, Robert Lee Mealey individually and doing business as Foreva Wings and Foreva Wings Bar & Grill LLC
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Galvin
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Christopher E Galvin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: $16,800.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00019
Not Yet Classified:
$16,800.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
In Re: $25,107.00 in United States Currency
as 4:2024mc00018
Not Yet Classified:
$25,107.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
