District of Arizona Court Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 48,242
Nance v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00923
Plaintiff: Keith Preston Nance
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Gregory Fizer, Jack Heet and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Head v. Interpublic Group of Companies Incorporated et al
as 3:2015cv08090
Plaintiff: Mitchell Head
Defendant: Interpublic Group of Companies Incorporated, Golin/Harris International Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Forrest, et al v. Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer PA
as 2:2015cv00921
Plaintiff: Stephen Paul Forrest , Patricia Marie Rehn
Defendant: Quintairos Prieto Wood & Boyer PA
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gardner v. Badada Inn and Suites Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00920
Plaintiff: Jasmine Gardner
Defendant: Badada Inn and Suites Incorporated, Days Inn and Suites of Surprise Incorporated, Anilkumar Patel and others
Cause Of Action: Denial of Overtime Compensation
Edwards v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00919
Plaintiff: Stephen S Edwards
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation, Magnus Title Agency LLC
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pryde et al v. BMO Financial Group et al
as 2:2015cv00926
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Holsum Bakery Incorporated v. Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers
as 2:2015cv00925
Plaintiff: Holsum Bakery Incorporated
Defendant: Local 232 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers
Cause Of Action: Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Joe Hand Promotions Incorporated v. Olson et al
as 2:2015cv00927
Cause Of Action: Communications Act of 1934
Love v. Escapule et al
as 2:2015cv00924
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sartor et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv00917
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.