District Court Cases in Arizona
Cases 21 - 30 of 89,895
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jones v. USA
as 3:2024cv08076
Petitioner:
Douglas Allen Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Herr v. Penzone
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Karen Ann Herr
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamara #331657 v. Richardson et al
as 3:2024cv08074
Plaintiff:
Elijah Joseph Kamara
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Edward Jones, GEO Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Nicholes et al
as 2:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Andre Nicholes, Sylvia Hamilton and William Bryant Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wampole v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wampole
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
