Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Trademark Cases filed in the Arkansas Eastern District Court before James M. Moody [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
July 6, 2009
Shell Trademark Management BV et al v. Flabama Petro Inc AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Shell Trademark Management BV, Motiva Enterprises LLC Defendant: Flabama Petro Inc
 
September 5, 2008
Lloyd Sales Company Inc v. Game LLC AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Lloyd Sales Company Inc Defendant: Game LLC
 
April 17, 2008
Candy Bouquet International Inc v McClendon AR Eastern Wright Trademark Federal Question
Plaintiff: Candy Bouquet International Inc; Defendant: Gina McClendon
 
October 2, 2007
Thirty Eight Street Inc et al v. Bajrang LLC AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: Thirty Eight Street Inc, Vantage Hospitality Group Inc; Defendant: Bajrang LLC
 
December 30, 2004
Arkansas Democrat v. eCorp.com Inc, et al AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
April 13, 2004
TCBY Systems LLC v. Ilhan, et al AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
February 9, 2004
Qwest Communications v. Lee, et al AR Eastern Moody Trademark Trademark Infringement
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.