US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,633
Wilson v. Brothers et al
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff: Daniel Wilson
Defendant: Brain Brothers, Short Wilson, Nick Gault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Westbrook et al
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Tommy Radford
Defendant: T Westbrook, Tyrone Allison and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Tommy Radford
Defendant: Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff: Jerome Meraz
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollins v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff: Darmartress Collins
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Chistopher Budnick, Toni Shockey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff: Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant: L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poindexter v. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff: Eddie A Poindexter
Defendant: Kim M Smith, Cristi R Beaumont, John C Threet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harkenreader v. USA
as 4:2024cv00232
Petitioner: Alex Harkenreader
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fongers v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff: Kenneth Mitchell Fongers
Defendant: C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harvey v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00236
Plaintiff: Paul Scott Harvey
Defendant: Eric Higgins, Musaddiq and Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?