US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,450
Kennedy v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kennedy
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Martha Rosario Gonzales
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Casey Reynolds
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Overturf v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Relinda Jenette Overturf and Relinda Jenette Woodring
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Omari Howard Patton
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Masiker v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Masiker
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, White County Detention Center and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Zayzhon Thompson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McJunkins v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Brent Charles McJunkins
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cassity v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Mark Cassity
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kellebrew v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2023cv01197
Plaintiff:
Marcus A Kellebrew
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
