US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 11 - 20 of 46,198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Parsons et al
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Tiequail Brown
Defendant:
Parsons, Echels, Wade Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crutchfield v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Katherine Crutchfield
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FCCI Insurance Company v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Christopher M Bennett, Michelle Bennett and Master Roof and Remodel LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sexson v. Office of Personnel Management
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Courtney Sexson
Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Pennington v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Calvin Taylor and Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 American Disability Act
Randle v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tevin Randle
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Ladner et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Ladner, Taylor Igleheart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
