US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 31 - 40 of 46,165
Cooney v. Knuckles
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Tyrone Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee et al v. Heard et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Barbara McKee and William McKee
Defendant:
Marquet D Heard, Direct Chassislink Inc and Lionhart Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Barajas v. Saline County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Saline County, Arkansas, Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toston v Parson, et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Charles Toston
Defendant:
Rick Parson and Sharon Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahrens v. Hessler et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
John Ahrens
Defendant:
Eric Hessler and Bennett Motor Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ridgell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Velma Ridgell
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Killough v. Molder et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Justin Killough
Defendant:
Kevin Molder, BJ Carter and Tabitha Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
