US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Cases 31 - 40 of 46,018
Jones v. Patton et al
as 4:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jeffery Wayne Phillips and Jack T Patterson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Willingham v. Dobbs et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Christopher Willingham
Defendant:
James Dobbs, Barbra Strom and Everrte Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rook v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jason Rook
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blevins v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Chad Blevins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davis v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Candy Davis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kendrick v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jacky Don Kendrick
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Cates v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Marty Cates
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Brooks v. Boyd et al
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Rohan Brooks
Defendant:
Brandon Boyd and One Gone Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.