US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Wesbster Business Credit Corp v. Bradley Lumber Company et al
as 1:2008cv01083
Plaintiff:
Wesbster Business Credit Corp
Defendant:
Bradley Lumber Company, Bradley Specialties, LLC, Bradley Specialties Division and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gall et al v. Vinton et al
as 5:2008cv05193
Plaintiff:
Elmer A Gall and Felice Gall
Defendant:
Richard Vinton and Eva Vinton
Counter Claimant:
Richard Vinton and Eva Vinton
Counter Defendant:
Elmer Gall and Felice Gall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bank of America,N.A. v. Meat Products International, Inc.
as 5:2008cv05154
Plaintiff:
Bank of America,N.A.
Defendant:
Meat Products International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hammond v. Ultimate Engines, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv02128
Plaintiff:
Murray Hammond
Defendant:
Ultimate Engines, LLC, Dawn L. Wagner and Michael D. Wagner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. C. Bean Transport, Inc., et al
as 6:2007cv06079
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Inc.
Defendant:
C. Bean Transport, Inc., Bean Lumber Company, Inc. and Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. MY ICIS, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv03031
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MY ICIS, Inc., Wayne Hicks and John Barrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. MY ICIS, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv05121
Plaintiff:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
MY ICIS, Inc., Wayne Hicks and John Barrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stone, et al v. TMS Mortgage, Inc., et al
as 4:2005cv04036
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrument
White, et al v. Tscherter, et al
as 5:2004cv05050
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
