US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,741
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Parks v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Orion Parks
Defendant:
Officer Shawn Taylor, Judge Mike Medlock, Jeremiah Corbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maskell v. Wagnon
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Cindy Wagnon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Titus v. Rihanna, et al
as 6:2024cv06045
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rihanna, Nikki Minaj, Eminem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Titus v. Harris et al
as 6:2024cv06044
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and Iamsui
Defendant:
Rapper T.I. Harris, Elon Musk, Beauty and the Beast (the movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vicentic v. City of Hot Springs
as 6:2024cv06042
Plaintiff:
Dragan Vicentic
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
