Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property - Patent Cases filed in the California Central District Court before Marshall [ Court Info ]

Results 1 - 16 of 16
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
July 15, 2009
Olivet International, Inc. v. Thule Organizational Solutions, Inc. CA Central Marshall Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Olivet International, Inc., Olivet International, Inc., Olivet International, Inc. Defendant: Thule Organizational Solutions, Inc.
 
July 14, 2009
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Apex Digital, Inc. CA Central Real Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. and others... Defendant: Apex Digital, Inc.
 
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Haier America Trading, LLC CA Central Real Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. and others... Defendant: Haier America Trading, LLC
 
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation CA Central Real Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. and others... Defendant: Microsoft Corporation
 
July 10, 2009
Kruse Technology Partnership v. General Motors Company CA Central Selna Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership, Kruse Technology Partnership Defendant: General Motors Company, General Motors Company, General Motors Company, General Motors Company, General Motors Company and others...
 
July 9, 2009
Eurand, Inc. et al v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al CA Central Marshall Other (830) Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Eurand, Inc., Eurand, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Anesta AG and others... Defendant: Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Anchen, Inc.
 
April 2, 2009
Absolute Software, Inc. et al v. Awareness Technologies, Inc. et al CA Central Marshall Patent Patent Infringement
Plaintiff: Absolute Software, Inc., Absolute Software, Inc., Absolute Software Corporation, Absolute Software Corporation Defendant: Awareness Technologies, Inc., Detto Technologies, Inc.
 
September 27, 2005
LG.Phillips LCD Co Ltd v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd CA Central Marshall Patent
September 16, 2005
Gossamer Designs LLC v. LaPierre-McAfee et al CA Central Marshall Patent
July 8, 2005
U.S. Philips Corporation v. Future Media Productions Inc CA Central Marshall Patent
March 16, 2005
Kara Technology Incorporated v. Stamps.com Inc CA Central Marshall Patent
January 10, 2005
Chunghwa Pictures Tubes Ltd v. LG Electronics Inc et al CA Central Marshall Patent
December 3, 2004
Anthony H Levine v. E and B Giftware et al CA Central Marshall Patent
November 19, 2004
MAG Instrument Inc v. Diversitech Group LLC et al CA Central Marshall Patent
October 29, 2004
University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Marc H Hedrick et al CA Central Marshall Patent
October 19, 2004
Frank M Weyer v. Ford Motor Company CA Central Marshall Patent
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.