Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the California Central District Court before Otero

Browse by Type of Forfeiture / Penalty Lawsuit

 



Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in the California Central District Court before Otero [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 16 of 16
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
March 18, 2009
United States of America v. $ 101, 300. 00 In U.S. Currency CA Central Otero Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $ 101, 300. 00 In U.S. Currency Claimant: Aaron Mejia Hernandez
 
January 6, 2009
United States of America v. $92,800.00 In U.S. Currency CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property - Aircraft
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $92,800.00 In U.S. Currency
 
August 12, 2008
United States of America v. $4,000,000.00 In United States Funds CA Central Otero Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $4,000,000.00 In United States Funds
 
March 18, 2008
United States of America v. $10,780.61 In Bank Funds CA Central Otero Other Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $10,780.61 In Bank Funds
 
January 29, 2008
United States of America v. $58,772.31 IN U.S. CURRENCY et al CA Central Wu Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: $58,772.31 IN U.S. CURRENCY, $50,615.89 In Bank Funds Seized from East West Bank Account
 
January 8, 2008
United States of America v. Nine Firearms CA Central Otero Other Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: Nine Firearms
 
November 6, 2007
United States of America v. Real Property Located in Pomona, California (Partida) CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Plaintiff: United States of America Defendant: Real Property Located in Pomona, California (Partida)
 
August 8, 2007
United States of America v. $142,714.00 In U S Currency CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $142,714.00 In U S Currency
 
June 29, 2007
United States of America v. $10,745.58 in U.S. Currency et al CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $10,745.58 in U.S. Currency, $9,113.00 in U.S. Currency
 
June 13, 2007
United States of America v. $12,300.00 in U.S. Currency CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $12,300.00 in U.S. Currency
 
May 3, 2007
United States of America v. $9,768.00 In U.S. Currency CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff: United States of America; Defendant: $9,768.00 In U.S. Currency
 
November 17, 2005
United States of America v. Two Parcels of Real Property in San Gabriel, California CA Central Otero Drug Related Seizure of Property
September 6, 2005
United States of America v. 510 Cartons of Womens Pants CA Central Otero Other
November 30, 2004
United States of America v. $90,967 in U S Currency CA Central Otero Other
October 12, 2004
United States of America v. 292,175.93 US Currency CA Central Otero Other
October 6, 2004
United States of America v. 7,953 Cartons of Wearing Apparel, More or Less CA Central Otero Other
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.