Search Federal District Court filings
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and

Intellectual Property Cases filed in the California Central District Court before Takasugi

Browse by Type of Intellectual Property Lawsuit

 



Intellectual Property Cases filed in the California Central District Court before Takasugi [ Court Info ]
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action
April 9, 2009
99 Cents Only Stores v. 99 Cents Grandollar et al CA Central Takasugi Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: 99 Cents Only Stores, 99 Cents Only Stores, 99 Cents Only Stores, 99 Cents Only Stores Defendant: 99 Cents Grandollar, Irene Kim, DOES
 
99 Only Stores v. 99 Store et al CA Central Takasugi Trademark Fed. Question: Trademark
Plaintiff: 99 Only Stores, 99 Only Stores, 99 Only Stores, 99 Only Stores Defendant: 99 Store, Ghaleb Khaas, Does
 
November 20, 2007
99 Cents Only Store v. Ebony's 99 Cents Plus Store et al CA Central Takasugi Trademark Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff: 99 Cents Only Store, 99 Cents Only Store, 99 Cents Only Store, 99 Cents Only Store Defendant: Ebony's 99 Cents Plus Store, DOES 1-20, inclusive
 
August 30, 2005
99 Cents Only Stores v. 99OK Inc et al CA Central Takasugi Trademark
April 22, 2004
Global Brand Marketing Inc v. J & L Footwear Inc et al CA Central Takasugi Patent
April 16, 2004
United States of America v. Able Time Inc CA Central Takasugi Trademark
December 30, 1994
James J Feuling v. Ed Pink, et al CA Central Takasugi Patent
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.